Preview

Regulatory Research and Medicine Evaluation

Advanced search

Expert Approaches to the Assessment of Losartan Drugs Bioequivalence

https://doi.org/10.30895/1991-2919-2020-10-1-51-62

Abstract

Angiotensin II receptor antagonists (ARAs) are one of the most promising classes of antihypertensive drugs. They are most widely represented on the Russian market by losartan drugs which total 24 items. Therefore, it is crucial to analyse the factors that may affect the results of comparison of generic and reference losartan drugs.

The aim of the study was to perform a retrospective analysis of bioequivalence studies of generic losartan drugs in order to develop approaches to expert evaluation of research protocols and reports.

Materials and methods: the retrospective analysis covered the results of 27 bioequivalence studies of losartan and included the calculation of the pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax and AUC0-t, their intra-individual variability, and the weighted average of intra-individual variability. The calculations were made for the pooled population of men and women, as well as separately for each gender.

Results: the data obtained indicate borderline high variability of losartan in bioequivalence studies (for Cmax in 50 % of the studies). It was demonstrated that losartan drugs may have different pharmacokinetics in men and women in terms of Cmax and AUC0-t. The retrospective analysis of the data made it possible to formulate relevant expert approaches to evaluation of protocols and reports of bioequivalence studies of losartan drugs.

Conclusions: Bioequivalence of losartan should be evaluated in three- or four-period, double crossover, two-sequence replicate design studies. The study has to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of the starting compound and its active metabolite; the period of determination of analytes should be at least 36 hours; the washout period of 7 days is sufficient; blood sampling should be more frequent during the first hour after administration for losartan and during the first 3–4 hours for the metabolite. When determining the sample size, the weighted average of the coefficient of intra-individual variability of Cmax of losartan (33 %) should be taken into account. The bioequivalence margins for Cmax can be scaled up.

About the Authors

D. P. Romodanovsky
Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products
Russian Federation

Dmitry P. Romodanovsky - Cand. Sci. (Med.).

8/2 Petrovsky Blvd, Moscow 127051



D. V. Goryachev
Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products
Russian Federation

Dmitry V. Goryachev - Dr. Sci. (Med.). 

8/2 Petrovsky Blvd, Moscow 127051



References

1. Poteshkina NG, Selivanova GV, Zhalsaraev TZ. Angiotensin II receptor antagonists in the treatment of hypertension: perspectives for clinical use. Arterialnaya gipertenziya = Arterial Hypertension. 2013;19(2):117—24 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18705/1607-419X-2013-19-2-117-124

2. Kuznetsova MV. Modern approach to antihypertensive therapy. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2015;(12):24-7 (In Russ.)

3. Davit BM, Conner DP, Fabian-Fritsch B, Haidar SH, Jiang X, Patel DT, et al. Highly variable drugs: observations from bioequivalence data submitted to the FDA for new generic drug applications. AAPS J. 2008;10(1):148-56. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-008-9015-x

4. Lohar V, Patel H, Rathore AS, Singhal S, Sharma AK, Sharma P. Bioequivalence and highly variable drugs: an overview. Int J Curr Res. 2012;4(8):124-46.

5. Davit BM, Chen ML, Conner DP, Haidar SH, Kim S, Lee CH, et al. Implementation of a reference-scaled average bioequivalence approach

6. for highly variable generic drug products by the US Food and Drug Administration. AAPS J. 2012;14(4):915-24. https://doi.org/10.1208/ s12248-012-9406-x

7. Tothfalusi L, Endrenyi L, Arieta AG. Evaluation of bioequivalence for highly variable drugs with scaled average bioequivalence. Clin Phar-macokinet. 2009;48(11):725-43. https://doi.org/10.2165/11318040-000000000-00000

8. Romodanovsky DP, Goryachev DV, Solovieva AP, Eremenko NN. Principles of statistical evaluation of bioequivalence studies in the context of current regulatory requirements and legal acts. Vedomosti Nauchnogo tsentra eksper-tizy sredstv meditsinskogo primeneniya = The Bulletin of the Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products. 2018;8(2):92-8 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30895/1991-2919-2018-8-2-92-98

9. Ibarra M, Vazquez M, Fagiolino P. Sex effect on average bioequivalence. Clin Ther. 2017;39(1):23-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.11.024


Review

For citations:


Romodanovsky D.P., Goryachev D.V. Expert Approaches to the Assessment of Losartan Drugs Bioequivalence. The Bulletin of the Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products. 2020;10(1):51-62. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30895/1991-2919-2020-10-1-51-62

Views: 1162


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 3034-3062 (Print)
ISSN 3034-3453 (Online)