Preview

Regulatory Research and Medicine Evaluation

Advanced search

Nociceptive Tests as Part of Multimodal Pain Assessment in Preclinical Trials (Review)

https://doi.org/10.30895/1991-2919-2026-16-1-76-91

Abstract

INTRODUCTION. Currently, preclinical development of analgetic drugs is facing a large number of obstacles, mostly due to the limited validity of models and methods for pain assessment. To overcome the translational barrier in the development of analgetics, it is necessary to revise the existing methods for assessing pain sensitivity and develop new approaches that include both the study of reflexive and affective pain component.

AIM. This study aimed to systematize a contemporary view of pain assessment methods in laboratory animals and develop applicability criteria in preclinical trials of new analgesics.

DISCUSSION. The literature review included 75 references, among them original research and systematic reviews over the past 35 years. Pain is a multidimensional phenomenon that includes sensory, discriminatory and affective-motivational components. Standard nociceptive tests effectively evaluate sensory hypersensitivity, however, they are not sensitive enough when studying chronic pain based on an affective component. Less widely used non-reflexive methods (grimace scale, ultrasound vocalization, burrowing test) allow assessing the affective component; still, they have low specificity and are insufficiently validated for various pain models. A combined, polymodal approach enhances the objectivity, reproducibility, and translational predictivity of preclinical research towards the development of new analgetics.

CONCLUSIONS. Nociceptive tests are a tool for assessing efficacy of anesthetics both at a primary screening and in preclinical trials. Standard nociceptive tests do not allow assessing affective pain component, thus development of new anesthetics necessitates an introduction of non-reflexive pain assessment in the preclinical trials. A combination of reflexive and non-reflexive pain assessment methods is a base for new research strategies in preclinical trials.

About the Authors

D. V. Surov
State Research Testing Institute of Military Medicine; Institute of Experimental Medicine
Russian Federation

Dmitry V. Surov 

4 Lesoparkovaya Street, Saint Petersburg, 195043; 12 Acad. Pavlov Street, Saint Petersburg, 197022



Ju. O. Kon’shakov
State Research Testing Institute of Military Medicine
Russian Federation

Jurij O. Konshakov, Cand. Sci. (Med.)

4 Lesoparkovaya Street, Saint Petersburg, 195043



N. G. Vengerovich
State Research Testing Institute of Military Medicine; Saint Petersburg State Chemical and Pharmaceutical University
Russian Federation

Nickolai G. Vengerovich, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor

4 Lesoparkovaya Street, Saint Petersburg, 195043; 14 Professor Popov St., Saint Petersburg 197376



References

1. Vierck CJ. Animal studies of pain: lessons for drug development. In: Campbell JN, ed. Emerging strategies for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Seattle: IASP Press; 2006. P. 475–95.

2. Hill R. NK1 (substance P) receptor antagonists — why are they not analgesic in humans? Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2000;21(7):244–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-6147(00)01502-9

3. Wallace MS, Rowbotham M, Bennett GJ, et al. A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover evaluation of a short course of 4030W92 in patients with chronic neuropathic pain. J Pain. 2002;3(3):227–33. https://doi.org/10.1054/jpai.2002.123650

4. Davis KD, Aghaeepour N, Ahn AH, et al. Discovery and validation of biomarkers to aid the development of safe and effective pain therapeutics: Challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Neurol. 2020;16(7):381–400. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-020-0362-2

5. Mao J. Current challenges in translational pain research. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2012;33(11):568–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2012.08.001

6. Asiri YI, Moni SS, Ramar M, Chidambaram K. Advancing pain understanding and drug discovery: Insights from preclinical models and recent research findings. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024;17(11):1439. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17111439

7. Mogil JS. Animal models of pain: Progress and challenges. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10(4):283–94. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2606

8. Mogil JS, Pang DSJ, Silva Dutra GG, Chambers CT. The development and use of facial grimace scales for pain measurement in animals. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020;116:480–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.07.013

9. Burma NE, Leduc-Pessah H, Fan CY, Trang T. Animal models of chronic pain: Advances and challenges for clinical translation. J Neurosci Res. 2017;95(6):1242–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.23768

10. Reid J, Scott M, Nolan A, Wiseman-Orr L. Pain assessment in animals. In Pract. 2013;35(2):51–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/inp.f631

11. Weary DM, Niel L, Flower FC, Fraser D. Identifying and preventing pain in animals. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2006;100(1–2):64–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.04.013

12. Modi AD, Parekh A, Pancholi YN. Evaluating pain behaviours: Widely used mechanical and thermal methods in rodents. Behav Brain Res. 2023;446:114417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2023.114417

13. Sneddon LU. Evolution of nociception in vertebrates: comparative analysis of lower vertebrates. Brain Res Rev. 2004;46(2):123–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2004.07.007

14. Loeser JD, Treede RD. The Kyoto protocol of IASP Basic Pain Terminology. Pain. 2008;137(3):473–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2008.04.025

15. Danilov AB. Neuropathic pain. Clinical Gerontology. 2007;13(2):27–36 (In Russ.). EDN: JHCZAB

16. Danilov AB, Isagulyan ED, Macka-schova ES. Psychogenic pain. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2018;118(11):103–8 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro2018118111103

17. Kosek E. The concept of nociplastic pain — where to from here? Pain. 2024;165(11):50–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003305

18. McKune CM, Murrell JC, Nolan AM, et al. Nociception and pain. Veterinary anesthesia and analgesia. Wiley; 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119421375.ch29

19. Price DD. Central neural mechanisms that interrelate sensory and affective dimensions of pain. Mol Inter. 2002;2(6):392–403. https://doi.org/10.1124/mi.2.6.392

20. Djouhri L, Koutsikou S, Fang X, et al. Spontaneous pain, both neuropathic and inflammatory, is related to frequency of spontaneous firing in intact C-fiber nociceptors. J Neurosci. 2006;26(4):1281–92. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3388-05.2006

21. Hansson P. Difficulties in stratifying neuropathic pain by mechanisms. Eur J Pain. 2003;7(4):353–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-3801(03)00051-X

22. Sneddon LU, Elwood RW, Adamo SA, Leach MC. Defining and assessing animal pain. Anim Behav. 2014;97:201–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.09.007

23. Talbot K, Madden VJ, Jones SL, Moseley GL. The sensory and affective components of pain: are they differentially modifiable dimensions or inseparable aspects of a unitary experience? A systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2019;123(2):263–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.033

24. Ong WY, Stohler CS, Herr DR. Role of the prefrontal cortex in pain processing. Mol Neurobiol. 2019;56(2):1137–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-018-1130-9

25. Labrakakis C. The role of the insular cortex in pain. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(6):5736. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065736

26. Langford DJ, Crager SE, Shehzad Z, et al. Social modulation of pain as evidence for empathy in mice. Science. 2006; 312(5782):1967–70. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128322

27. Langford DJ, Bailey AL, Chanda ML, et al. Coding of facial expressions of pain in the laboratory mouse. Nat Methods. 2010;7(6):447–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1455

28. Zhang XJ, Zhang TW, Hu SJ, Xu H. Behavioral assessments of the aversive quality of pain in animals. Neurosci Bull. 2011; 27(1):61–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-011-1035-3

29. Sneddon LU. Comparative physiology of nociception and pain. Physiology (Bethesda). 2018;33(1):63–73. https://doi.org/10.1152/physiol.00022.2017

30. Touska F, Winter Z, Mueller A, et al. Comprehensive thermal preference phenotyping in mice using a novel automated circular gradient assay. Temperature (Austin). 2016;3(1):77–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2015.1135689

31. Hill RZ, Bautista DM. Getting in touch with mechanical pain mechanisms. Trends Neurosci. 2020;43(5):311–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2020.03.004

32. Carstens E, Moberg GP. Recognizing pain and distress in laboratory animals. ILAR J. 2000;41(2):62–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar.41.2.62

33. Costigan M, Woolf CJ. Pain: Molecular mechanisms. J Pain. 2000;1(3 Suppl):35–44. https://doi.org/10.1054/jpai.2000.9818

34. Zimmermann K, Hein A, Hager U, et al. Phenotyping sensory nerve endings in vitro in the mouse. Nat Protoc. 2009;4(2):174–96. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.223

35. Cain DM, Khasabov SG, Simone DA. Response properties of mechanoreceptors and nociceptors in mouse glabrous skin: an in vivo study. J Neurophysiol. 2001;85(4):1561–74. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.2001.85.4.1561

36. Basbaum AI, Bautista DM, Scherrer G, Julius D. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of pain. Cell. 2009;139(2):267–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.09.028

37. Dubin AE, Patapoutian A. Nociceptors: the sensors of the pain pathway. J Clin Invest. 2010;120(11):3760–72. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI42843

38. Turner PV, Pang DS, Lofgren JL. A review of pain assessment methods in laboratory rodents. Comp Med. 2019;69(6):451–67. https://doi.org/10.30802/aalas-cm-19-000042

39. Barrot M. Tests and models of nociception and pain in rodents. Neuroscience. 2012;211:39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.12.041

40. Gårdmark M, Höglund AU, Hammarlund-Udenaes M. Aspects on tail-flick, hot-plate and electrical stimulation tests for morphine antinociception. Pharmacol Toxicol. 1998;83(6):252–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0773.1998.tb01478.x

41. Eschalier A, Marty H, Trolese JF, et al. An automated method to analyze vocalization of unrestrained rats submitted to noxious electrical stimuli. J Pharmacol Methods. 1988;19(2):175–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-5402(88)90038-1

42. Sadler KE, Mogil JS, Stucky CL. Innovations and advances in modelling and measuring pain in animals. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2022;23(2):70–85. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-021-00536-7

43. Chaplan SR, Bach FW, Pogrel JW, et al. Quantitative assessment of tactile allodynia in the rat paw. J Neurosci Methods. 1994;53(1):55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0270(94)90144-9

44. Minett MS, Quick K, Wood JN. Behavioral measures of pain thresholds. Curr Protoc Mouse Biol. 2011;1(3):383–412. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470942390.mo110116

45. Deuis JR, Dvorakova LS, Vetter I. Methods used to evaluate pain behaviors in rodents. Front Mol Neurosci. 2017;10:284. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2017.00284

46. Callahan BL, Gil ASC, Levesque A, Mogil JS. Modulation of mechanical and thermal nociceptive sensitivity in the laboratory mouse by behavioral state. J Pain. 2008;9(2):174–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2007.10.011

47. Decosterd I, Woolf CJ. Spared nerve injury: an animal model of persistent peripheral neuropathic pain. Pain. 2000;87(2):149–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00276-1

48. Nirogi R, Goura V, Shanmuganathan D, et al. Comparison of manual and automated filaments for evaluation of neuropathic pain behavior in rats. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2012;66(1):8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vascn.2012.04.006

49. Gaffney CM, Muwanga G, Shen H, et al. Mechanical conflict-avoidance assay to measure pain behavior in mice. J Vis Exp. 2022;(180):63454. https://doi.org/10.3791/63454

50. Harte SE, Meyers JB, Donahue RR, et al. Mechanical conflict system: A novel operant method for the assessment of nociceptive behavior. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0150164. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150164

51. D’Amour FE, Smith DL. A method for determining loss of pain sensation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1941;72(1):74–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3565(25)03823-6

52. Rossi HL, Neubert JK. Effects of hot and cold stimulus combinations on the thermal preference of rats. Behav Brain Res. 2009;203(2):240–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2009.05.009

53. Jensen TS, Yaksh TL. Comparison of the antinociceptive action of Mu and delta opioid receptor ligands in the periaqueductal gray matter, medial and paramedial ventral medulla in the rat as studied by the microinjection technique. Brain Res. 1986;372(2):301–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(86)91138-8

54. Bannon AW, Malmberg AB. Models of nociception: Hot-plate, tail-flick, and formalin tests in rodents. Curr Protoc Neurosci. 2007;Chapter 8:Unit 8.9. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142301.ns0809s41

55. Zhou Q, Bao Y, Zhang X, et al. Optimal interval for hot water immersion tail-flick test in rats. Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2014;26(4):218–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/neu.2013.57

56. Dogrul A, Uzbay TI. Topical clonidine antinociception. J Pain. 2004;111(3):385–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2004.07.020

57. Yezierski RP, Vierck CJ. Should the hot-plate test be reincarnated? J Pain. 2011;12(8):936–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2011.05.003

58. Gunn A, Bobeck EN, Weber C, Morgan MM. The influence of non-nociceptive factors on hot-plate latency in rats. J Pain. 2011;12(2):222–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2010.06.011

59. Espejo EF, Mir D. Differential effects of weekly and daily exposure to the hot plate on the rat’s behavior. Physiol Behav. 1994;55(6):1157–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(94)90404-9

60. Yalcin I, Charlet A, Freund-Mercier MJ, et al. Differentiating thermal allodynia and hyperalgesia using dynamic hot and cold plate in rodents. J Pain. 2009;10(7):767–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2009.01.325

61. Yeomans DC, Pirec V, Proudfit HK. Nociceptive responses to high and low rates of noxious cutaneous heating are mediated by different nociceptors in the rat: Behavioral evidence. Pain. 1996;68(1):133–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(96)03176-4

62. Hargreaves K, Dubner R, Brown F, et al. A new and sensitive method for measuring thermal nociception in cutaneous hyperalgesia. Pain. 1988;32(1):77–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(88)90026-7

63. Balayssac D, Ling B, Ferrier J, et al. Assessment of thermal sensitivity in rats using the thermal place preference test: description and application in the study of oxaliplatin-induced acute thermal hypersensitivity and inflammatory pain models. Behav Pharmacol. 2014;25(2):99–111. https://doi.org/10.1097/FBP.0000000000000026

64. Salte K, Lea G, Franek M, Vaculin S. Baclofen reversed thermal place preference in rats with chronic constriction injury. Physiol Res. 2016;65(2):349–55. https://doi.org/10.33549/physiolres.933008

65. Bourgeois JR, Feustel PJ, Kopec AM. Sex differences in choice-based thermal nociceptive tests in adult rats. Behav Brain Res. 2022;429:113919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2022.113919

66. Smolinsky AN, Bergner CL, LaPorte JL, Kalueff AV. Analysis of grooming behavior and its utility in studying animal stress, anxiety, and depression. In: Gould TD, ed. Mood and anxiety related phenotypes in mice. Totowa NJ: Humana Press; 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-303-9_2

67. Domínguez-Oliva A, Mota-Rojas D, Hernández-Avalos I, et al. The neurobiology of pain and facial movements in rodents: Clinical applications and current research. Front Vet Sci. 2022;9:1016720. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.1016720

68. Tuttle AH, Molinaro MJ, Jethwa JF, et al. A deep neural network to assess spontaneous pain from mouse facial expressions. Mol Pain. 2018;14:1744806918763658. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744806918763658

69. Burgdorf JS, Ghoreishi-Haack N, Cearley CN, et al. Rat ultrasonic vocalizations as a measure of the emotional component of chronic pain. Neuroreport. 2019;30(13):863–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000001282

70. Han JS, Bird GC, Li W, et al. Computerized analysis of audible and ultrasonic vocalizations of rats as a standardized measure of pain-related behavior. J Neurosci Methods. 2005;141(2):261–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.07.005

71. Wallace VCJ, Norbury TA, Rice ASC. Ultrasound vocalisation by rodents does not correlate with behavioural measures of persistent pain. Eur J Pain. 2005;9(4):445–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2004.10.006

72. Lau W, Dykstra C, Thevarkunnel S, Silenieks LB, de Lannoy IAM, Lee DKH. A back translation of pregabaline and carbamazepine against evoked and non-evoked endpoints in the rat spared nerve injury model of neuropatic pain. Neuropharmacology. 2013;73:204–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.05.023

73. Jirkof P, Cesarovic N, Rettich A, et al. Burrowing behavior as an indicator of post-laparotomy pain in mice. Front Behav Neurosci. 2010;4:165. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2010.00165

74. Muralidharan A, Kuo A, Jacob M, et al. Comparison of burrowing and stimuli-evoked pain behaviors as end-points in rat models of inflammatory pain and peripheral neuropathic pain. Front Behav Neurosci. 2016;10:88. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00088

75. van Loo PL, Everse LA, Bernsen MR, et al. Analgesics in mice used in cancer research: Reduction of discomfort? Lab Anim. 1997;31(4):318–25. https://doi.org/10.1258/002367797780596211


Review

For citations:


Surov D.V., Kon’shakov J.O., Vengerovich N.G. Nociceptive Tests as Part of Multimodal Pain Assessment in Preclinical Trials (Review). Regulatory Research and Medicine Evaluation. 2026;16(1):76-91. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30895/1991-2919-2026-16-1-76-91

Views: 499

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 3034-3062 (Print)
ISSN 3034-3453 (Online)