Planning of a Clinical Data Registry for Basic Anti-Inflammatory Drugs for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis
https://doi.org/10.30895/1991-2919-2018-8-4-238-245
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune rheumatic disease of unknown etiology which manifests itself in chronic erosive arthritis (synovitis) and systemic lesions affecting internal organs. The main emphasis in the RA treatment is placed on the pharmacological therapy: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, ordinary analgesics, glucocorticoids, basic synthetic anti-inflammatory drugs, and targeted therapy drugs which are now represented by genetically engineered biologicals. The choice of rational treatment options for this severe disease is an important challenge facing modern medicine. The study reported in this paper analysed the clinical data registry for basic anti-inflammatory drugs for RA treatment, which was elaborated based on RA classification and diagnostic criteria. It was revealed that a product’s indications for use are formulated in the clinical data registry based on the product’s pharmacological properties and are accompanied with the description of the target population. It is necessary to provide a list of clinical parameters that will be monitored in the study to demonstrate the efficacy of treatment. The main efficacy endpoint may be chosen based on the product’s pharmacological properties. The efficacy is assessed using integrated indicators. Expected endpoints should be in line with the declared indication for use. Trials that confirm efficacy of a product should assess its therapeutic potential to the fullest extent possible. Before a medicinal product is authorised, it is necessary to obtain sufficient data on its safety, taking into account potential risks of long-term use.
About the Authors
D. V. GoryachevRussian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Med.), Director of the Centre for Evaluation and Control of Medicinal Products
8/2 Petrovsky Blvd, Moscow 127051, Russian Federation
M. Yu Telnykh
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Med.), 1st Professional Category Expert of Division No. 2 on Medicinal Products’ Efficacy and Safety of the Centre for Evaluation and Control of Medicinal Products
8/2 Petrovsky Blvd, Moscow 127051, Russian Federation
References
1. Насонов ЕЛ, Каратеев ДЕ, Балабанова РМ. Ревматоидный артрит. В кн.: Насонов ЕЛ, Насонова ВА, ред. Ревматология. Национальное руководство. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2008. [Nasonov EL, Karateev DE, Balabanova RM. Rheumatoid arthritis. In: Nasonov EL, Nasonova VA. Rheumatology. National guidance. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2008 (In Russ.)]
2. Combe B, Landewe R, Lukas C, Bolosiu HD, Breedveld F, Dougados M, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of early arthritis: report of a task force of the European Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(1):34–45. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2005.044354
3. Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Bijlsma JW, Breedveld FC, Boumpas D, Burmester G, et al. Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: recommendations of international task force. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(4):631–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2009.123919
4. Korpela M, Laasonen L, Hannonen P, Kautiainen H, Leirisalo-Repo M, Hakala M, et al. Retardation of joint damage in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis by initial aggressive treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: five-year experience from the FIN-RACo study. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(7):2072–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.20351
5. Насонов ЕЛ, ред. Ревматология. Клинические рекомендации. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2010. [Nasonov EL, ed. Rheumatology. Clinical guidelines. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2010 (In Russ.)]
6. Горячев ДВ, Тельных МЮ, Бунятян НД. Регуляторные подходы к оценке биоаналогов для лечения ревматических заболеваний. Ведомости Научного Центра экспертизы средств медицинского применения. 2017;7(3):155–63. [Goryachev DV, Telnykh MYu, Bunyatyan ND. Regulatory approaches to evaluation of biosimilars for treatment of rheumatic diseases. Vedomosti Nauchnogo tsentra ekspertizy sredstv meditsinskogo primeneniya=The Bulletin of the Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products. 2017;7(3):155–63 (In Russ.)] https://doi.org/10.30895/1991-2919-2017-7-3-155-163
7. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO, et al. 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(9):2569–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.27584
8. van der Woude D, Young A, Jayakumar K, Mertens BJ, Toes RE, van der Heijde D, et al. Prevalence of and predictive factors for sustained disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-free remission in rheumatoid arthritis: results from two large early arthritis cohorts. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(8):2262–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24661
9. Aletaha D, Funovits J, Ward MM, Smolen JS, Kvien TK. Perception of improvement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis varies with disease activity levels at baseline. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61(3):313–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24282
10. de Wit MP, Smolen JS, Gossec L, van der Heijde D. Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: the patient version of the international recommendations. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:891–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2010.146662
11. Boers M. International consensus on which measures to use in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Neth J Med 1993;43(1–2):55–8. PMID: 7694164
12. van Gestel AM, Anderson JJ, van Riel PL, Boers M, Haagsma CJ, Rich B, et al. ACR and EULAR improvement criteria have comparable validity in rheumatoid arthritis trials. J Rheumatol. 1999;26(3):705–11. PMID: 10090187
13. Fautrel B, Guillemin F, Meyer O, de Bandt M, Berthelot JM, Flipo RM, et al. Choice of second-line disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs after failure of methotrexate therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: a decision tree for clinical practice based on rheumatologists’ preferences. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61(4):425–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24588
14. van der Heijde D, Burmester G, Melo-Gomes J, Codreanu C, Martin Mola E, Pedersen R, et al. Inhibition of radiographic progression with combination etanercept and methotrexate in patients with moderately active rheumatoid arthritis previously treated with monotherapy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(7):1113–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2008.094375
15. Aletaha D, Landewe R, Karonitsch T, Bathon J, Boers M, Bombardier C, et al. Reporting disease activity in clinical trials of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: EULAR/ACR collaborative recommendations. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67(10):1360–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2008.091454
16. Bakker MF, Jacobs JW, Verstappen SM, Bijlsma JW. Tight control in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: efficacy and feasibility. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(Suppl. 3):iii56-iii60. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2007.078360
17. Bruynesteyn K, van der Heijde D, Boers M, Saudan A, Peloso P, Paulus H, et al. Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in rheumatoid arthritis joint damage of the Sharp/van der Heijde and Larsen/Scott scoring methods by clinical experts and comparison with the smallest detectable difference. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46(4):913–20. PMID: 11953967
18. Aletaha D, Smolen J. The Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI): a review of their usefulness and validity in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005; 23(5 Suppl. 39):S100–8. PMID: 16273793
19. Felson DT, Smolen JS, Wells G, Zhang B, van Tuyl LH, Funovits J, et al. American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism provisional definition of remission in rheumatoid arthritis for clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63(3):573–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.30129
20. Aletaha D, Ward MM, Machold KP, Nell VP, Stamm T, Smolen JS. Remission and active disease in rheumatoid arthritis: defining criteria for disease activity states. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(9):2625–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.21235
21. Heiberg T, Kvien TK, Mowinckel P, Aletaha D, Smolen JS, Hagen KB. Identification of disease activity and health status cut-off points for the symptom state acceptable to patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67(7):967–71. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2007.077503
22. Smolen JS, Breedveld FC, Schiff MH, Kalden JR, Emery P, Eberl G, et al. A simplified disease activity index for rheumatoid arthritis for use in clinical practice. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003;42(2):244–57. PMID: 12595618
23. Smolen JS, Aletaha D. Activity assessments in rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2008;20(3):306–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOR.0b013e3282fbd382
24. Soubrier M, Dougados M. Selecting criteria for monitoring patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Joint Bone Spine. 2005;72(2):129–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2004.05.007
25. Aletaha D, Smolen J, Ward MM. Measuring function in rheumatoid arthritis: Identifying reversible and irreversible components. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(9):2784–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.22052
26. Bruynesteyn K, van der Heijde D, Boers M, Lassere M, Boonen A, Edmonds J, et al. Minimal clinically important difference in radiological progression of joint damage over 1 year in rheumatoid arthritis: preliminary results of a validation study with clinical experts. J Rheumatol. 2001;28(4):904–10. PMID: 11327274
27. Machold KP, Stamm TA, Nell VP, Pflugbeil S, Aletaha D, Steiner G, et al. Very recent onset rheumatoid arthritis: clinical and serological patient characteristics associated with radiographic progression over the first years of disease. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007;46(2):342–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kel237
28. van der Helm-van Mil AH, Detert J, le Cessie S, Filer A, Bastian H, Burmester GR, et al. Validation of a prediction rule for disease outcome in patients with recent-onset undifferentiated arthritis: moving toward individualized treatment decision-making. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(8):2241–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.23681
29. Gulfe A, Aletaha D, Saxne T, Geborek P. Disease activity level, remission and response in established rheumatoid arthritis: performance of various criteria sets in an observational cohort, treated with anti-TNF agents. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10:41. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-10-41
30. Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Grisar JC, Stamm TA, Sharp JT. Estimation of a numerical value for joint damage-related physical disability in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(6):1058–64. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2009.114652
31. Schoels M, Kapral T, Stamm T, Smolen JS, Aletaha D. Step-up combination versus switching of non-biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: results from a retrospective observational study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(8):1059–65. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2006.061820
32. Boers M. Combination treatment in autoimmune diseases. Methodology of combination trials. Springer Semin Immunopathol. 2001;23(1–2):27–33. PMID: 11455857
33. Kapral T, Dernoschnig F, Machold KP, Stamm T, Schoels M, Smolen JS, et al. Remission by composite scores in rheumatoid arthritis: are ankles and feet important? Arthritis Res Ther. 2007;9(4):R72. https://doi.org/10.1186/ar2270
34. Boers M, Anderson JJ, Felson DT. Deriving an operational definition of low disease activity state in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2003;30(5):1112–4. PMID: 12734919
35. Suresh E, Lambert CM. Combination treatment strategies in early rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(9):1252–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2004.032219
36. Saag KG, Teng GG, Patkar NM, Anuntiyo J, Finney C, Curtis JR, et al. American College of Rheumatology 2008 recommendations for the use of nonbiologic and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(6):762–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.23721
37. Ferraccioli GF, Gremese E, Tomietto P, Favret G, Damato R, Di Poi E. Analysis of improvements, full responses, remission and toxicity in rheumatoid patients treated with step-up combination therapy (methotrexate, cyclosporin A, sulphasalazine) or monotherapy for three years. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2002;41(8):892–8. PMID: 12154206
38. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO, et al. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(9):1580–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2010.138461
39. Garnero P, Landewe R, Boers M, Verhoeven A, van der Linden S, Christgau S, et al. Association of baseline levels of markers of bone and cartilage degradation with long-term progression of joint damage in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: the COBRA study. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46(11):2847–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.10616
40. Puolakka K, Kautiainen H, Mottonen T, Hannonen P, Korpela M, Hakala M, et al. Early suppression of disease activity is essential for maintenance of work capacity in patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis: five-year experience from the FIN-RACo trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(1):36–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.20716
41. Wolfe F, Rasker JJ, Boers M, Wells GA, Michaud K. Minimal disease activity, remission, and the long-term outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57(6):935–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.22895
Review
For citations:
Goryachev D.V., Telnykh M.Yu. Planning of a Clinical Data Registry for Basic Anti-Inflammatory Drugs for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. The Bulletin of the Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products. 2018;8(4):238-245. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30895/1991-2919-2018-8-4-238-245