Preview

Regulatory Research and Medicine Evaluation

Advanced search

Assessing the impact of the automation on the variability of the «Dissolution» test results as exemplified by «Betahistine hydrochloride tablets 16 mg»

Abstract

The article analyses the results of dissolution testing of Betahistine hydrochloride 16 mg tablets using both manual and automatic sampling. The analysis showed that the data obtained with manual sampling are statistically identical to those obtained with automatic sampling in terms of average values and variance (with significance level α = 0,05), which confirms that the automation of the dissolution test does not affect the variability of test results.

About the Authors

G. F. Vasilenko
Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products
Russian Federation


N. S. Dubovik
I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Russian Federation


I. E. Shohin
I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Russian Federation


G. N. Gildeeva
I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Russian Federation


G. V. Ramenskaya
I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Russian Federation


L. A. Pavlova
I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Russian Federation


References

1. Tentsova AI. The dosage form and the therapeutic efficacy of drugs. Moscow: Meditsina; 1974 (in Russian).

2. Ramenskaya GV, Nedogoda SV, Shohin IE, Savchenko AYu, Shlykov VS. Therapeutic drugs and biopharmaceutical evaluation of indapamide. Kardiovaskulyarnaya terapiya i profilaktika 2011; 10(8): 105–9 (in Russian).

3. Zhang Hua Yu, Lawrence X. Dissolution testing for solid oral drug products: theoretical considerations. Amer Pharm Rev. 2010; (6): 1–4.

4. Smehova IE, Perova YuM, Kondratiev IA, Rodygina AN, Turetskova NN. Test «Dissolution» and modern approaches to the assessment of equivalence of drugs. Razrabotka i registratsiya lekarstvennyh sredstv 2013; 1(2): 50–60 (in Russian).

5. Features of pharmaceutical technological equipment ERWEKA. The development and registration of drugs. Special Issue Analytics EXPO 2013: 6–10 (in Russian).

6. Iarriccio A, Kassis A, Patel T. Increasing the Efficiency of the Dissolution Laboratory through Automation. The Review of American Pharmaceutical Business and Technology 2011.

7. Kretz J, Wong-Moon K. Evaluation of Automation to Increase Efficiency in the Dissolution Lab. Dissolution Technologies 2013; 20(2): 33–7.

8. USP 33 — NF 28. Monograph 1092 «The Dissolution Procedure: Development and Validation».

9. State Register of measuring instruments. Available from: http://www.fundmetrology.ru/10_tipy_si/list.aspx (in Russian).

10. State quality standard drug. GPA 42-0003–04 «Dissolution». Moscow; 2004 (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Vasilenko G.F., Dubovik N.S., Shohin I.E., Gildeeva G.N., Ramenskaya G.V., Pavlova L.A. Assessing the impact of the automation on the variability of the «Dissolution» test results as exemplified by «Betahistine hydrochloride tablets 16 mg». The Bulletin of the Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products. 2016;(3):53-57. (In Russ.)

Views: 654


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 3034-3062 (Print)
ISSN 3034-3453 (Online)