Preview

Regulatory Research and Medicine Evaluation

Advanced search

Detection of Pyrogens in Hormonal Implants Using the LAL Test

https://doi.org/10.30895/1991-2919-2021-11-2-115-120

Abstract

The State Pharmacopoeia of the Russian Federation, 14th edition states that implants are a sterile dosage form, and have to be tested for pyrogens. However, it does not provide details on how the test should be performed for this dosage form.

The aim of the study was to develop a LAL test procedure for detection of bacterial endotoxins (BE) in implants, using the example of a goserelin product.

Materials and methods: BE extraction from the implant surface into an aqueous medium was performed with subsequent BE detection in the extract by turbidimetric kinetic test. The implant was then dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide, and the obtained goserelin solution was tested for BEs using the gel-clot test.

Results: the analysis of the Russian and foreign pharmacopoeial approaches to pyrogenic substance detection in hormonal implants helped to develop two sample preparation procedures for determination of BE content (in the extract and the implant solution). It was demonstrated that the BE content in the water extract did not exceed 0.01 EU/mL and was less than 0.07 EU per implant. The BE content in the implant solution was less than 8.3 EU per 1 mg of goserelin, which is almost eleven-fold lower than the theoretically-derived limit.

Conclusions: the authors developed two test procedures for BE detection in hormonal implants using the LAL test, which could be included in manufacturers’ product files. The first procedure involves testing of the water extract from the implant surface and establishes the BE limit of no more than 20 EU/product. The second procedure involves complete dissolution of the implant in dimethyl sulfoxide and establishes the limit of not more than 97.22 EU per 1 mg of goserelin.

About the Authors

N. P. Neugodova
Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products
Russian Federation

Natalia P. Neugodova, Cand. Sci. (Biol.)

8/2 Petrovsky Blvd, Moscow 127051



O. V. Shapovalova
Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products
Russian Federation

Olga V. Shapovalova, Cand. Sci. (Pharm.)

8/2 Petrovsky Blvd, Moscow 127051



G. A. Sapozhnikova
Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products
Russian Federation

Galina A. Sapozhnikova

8/2 Petrovsky Blvd, Moscow 127051



E. O. Stepanyuk
Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products
Russian Federation

Ekaterina O. Stepanyuk

8/2 Petrovsky Blvd, Moscow 127051



References

1. Ouédraogo M, Semdé R, Somé TI, Ouédraogo M, Ouédraogo R, Henschel V, et al. Development of an in vitro endotoxin test for monoolein–water liquid crystalline gel for use as an implant. Trop J Pharm Res. 2009;8(6):501–8.

2. Sun V, Chzhan S, Van T, Sun K, Li Yu, Liu V. Pharmeceutical compositions of Goserelin microspheres with prolonged release. Patent of the Russian Federation No. 2694901C2; 2014 (In Russ.)

3. Bikbov MM, Fayzrakhmanov RR, Arslangareeva II, Salavatova VF, Pavlovsky OA. Action features of the implant with dexamethasone on indicators of retinal vein occlusions. Oftal'mokhirurgiya = Ophthalmic Surgery. 2018;(2):46–50 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25276/0235-4160-2018-2-46-50

4. Pustotina OA. Progestin-only implant contraception (a review of global clinical guidelines). Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2015;(XX):5–6 (In Russ.)

5. Stewart SA, Domínguez-Robles J, Donnelly R, Larrañeta E. Implantable polymeric drug delivery devices: Classification, manufacture, materials, and clinical applications. Polymers (Basel). 2018;10(12):1379. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10121379

6. Rajgor N, Bhaskar V, Patel M. Implantable drug delivery systems: An overview. Syst Rev Pharm. 2011;2(2):91–5.

7. Mazzotti F, Beuttler J, Zeller R, Fink U, Schindler S, Wendel A, et al. In vitro pyrogen test – a new test method for solid medical devices. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007;80(2):276–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30922

8. Wallin RF. A practical guide to ISO 10993-11: Systemic Effects. Medical Device and Diagnostic Industry Magazine, July 1998.

9. Allen D, Clippinger A, Morefield S, Casey W, Ghosh C, Goode J, Brown J. Using the Monocyte Activation Test for medical devices. NICEATM poster: SOT 2019 Annual Meeting.

10. Borton LK, Coleman KP. Material-mediated pyrogens in medical devices: Applicability of the in vitro Monocyte Activation Test. ALTEX. 2018;35(4):453–63. https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1709221

11. Silva C, Oliveira C, Carneiro P, Marengo E, Mattos K, Almeida R, et al. Alternative methods for the detection of pyrogens in products and environment subject to public health surveillance: advances and perspectives in Brazil based on the international recognition of the Monocyte Activation. Vigil Sanit Debate. 2018;6(1):137–49. https://doi.org/10.22239/2317-269x.01082

12. Stang K, Fennrich S, Krajewski S, Stoppelkamp S, Burgener IA, Wendel HP, Post M. Highly sensitive pyrogen detection on medical devices by the monocyte activation test. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2014;25(4):1065–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-013-5136-6

13. Williams KL, ed. Endotoxins. Pyrogens, LAL Testing and Depyrogenation. 3rd ed. New York: CRC Press; 2007.

14. Shapovalova OV, Dolgova GV, Neugodova NP, Sapozhnikova GA. Organic solvents for determination of bacterial endotoxin index in water-insoluble pharmaceutical substances. Antibiotiki i khimioterapiya = Antibiotics and Chemotherapy. 2013;58(9–10):41–4 (In Russ.)


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Neugodova N.P., Shapovalova O.V., Sapozhnikova G.A., Stepanyuk E.O. Detection of Pyrogens in Hormonal Implants Using the LAL Test. The Bulletin of the Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products. 2021;11(2):115-120. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30895/1991-2919-2021-11-2-115-120

Views: 746


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 3034-3062 (Print)
ISSN 3034-3453 (Online)